Focused Claim Review
For one paper, claim, deck section, or clearly bounded scientific question. The review identifies what is supported, what is not, and why it matters.
From $1,250 USDUsually delivered within 5 business days
See the focused reviewI help investors, founders, institutions, and decision-makers evaluate science-heavy claims before they commit capital, credibility, or organizational support.
I can review work outside these areas when the core question is methodological, but these are the domains in which my scientific background is most directly relevant.
Start with one claim, one call, or a full evidence package. Every written engagement is fixed-fee and scoped in advance.
For one paper, claim, deck section, or clearly bounded scientific question. The review identifies what is supported, what is not, and why it matters.
From $1,250 USDUsually delivered within 5 business days
See the focused reviewFor a product, proposal, or evidence package requiring methods review, mechanism assessment, and a concise decision-ready memo.
From $2,500 USDUsually delivered within 7 to 10 business days
See the executive reviewFor high-stakes decisions involving multiple claims, a larger literature, or substantial uncertainty about translation and failure modes.
From $5,000 USDUsually delivered within 2 to 3 weeks
See full diligenceA 60-minute discussion with limited advance review and a brief written summary. The $450 USD fee is credited toward a written review started within 7 days.
The review explicitly separates established findings, inference, assumption, uncertainty, and speculation. Weaknesses are stated directly, without manufacturing certainty where the evidence does not support it.
Explain what is being evaluated, what decision it informs, and what evidence is currently available.
I identify the appropriate depth, exclusions, timeline, and deliverable before work begins.
The memo prioritizes decision-relevant strengths, limitations, uncertainty, and implications.
A focused discussion can clarify findings and the questions that should be asked next.
Read a sample decision memo and selected publications that document the methods and subject areas I use in client reviews.
See how a client-facing memo states what the evidence supports, what it does not establish, which risks matter, and what evidence would change the conclusion.
View the sample reviewSee the published work behind my experience in clinical neuroimaging, cognitive aging, evidence synthesis, measurement, EEG and ERP, and applied human factors.
View publications and relevanceI will tell you quickly whether the question is a fit and which service level is appropriate.