Choose a 60-minute advisory call, a focused written review, or full scientific diligence according to the size and stakes of the decision. Written reviews are fixed-fee, scoped in advance, and delivered as decision-ready memos.
All prices are in USD. Exact scope, timing, and fee are confirmed in writing before work begins.
For a defined question that benefits from expert discussion before a larger review is commissioned.
For one paper, claim, deck section, report section, or tightly bounded scientific question.
For a product, proposal, intervention, assessment, or evidence package requiring a broader independent review.
For consequential decisions involving multiple claims, a substantial literature, or material uncertainty about real-world translation.
For multi-claim, board-level, institutional, policy, or legal-adjacent questions requiring a longer technical record, multiple stakeholder meetings, or review of unusually large evidence packages.
Rush delivery, original data analysis, unusually large source packages, multiple products, or additional stakeholder meetings may increase the fee. No conclusion is guaranteed in advance.
The $450 Scientific Advisory Call can be paid immediately. For written reviews and workshops, use these links after the fixed scope and fee have been confirmed.
Every review applies the same core tests. Larger engagements cover more claims, more evidence, and more uncertainty.
What is asserted, what is implied, which assumptions must be true, and whether the language outruns the evidence.
Study design, measurement, sampling, statistical reasoning, causal interpretation, robustness, replicability, and generalizability.
What can be concluded now, what remains uncertain, which risks matter most, and what evidence would change the decision.
My work spans cognitive neuroscience, clinical neuroimaging, aging, evidence synthesis, measurement, EEG and ERP, and applied human factors. That breadth helps identify whether a claim fails at the level of study design, measurement, mechanism, interpretation, or real-world transfer.
I have published work on ketamine-related brain changes in treatment-resistant depression and cognitive reserve under white-matter injury. This experience is directly relevant to claims about brain health, neuroimaging, aging, clinical mechanisms, and resilience.
See the publicationsI have also studied the reliability of cognitive-control measures and whether simulator features improve transfer to real performance. This supports reviews of assessments, behavioral measures, training systems, and product claims.
See the publicationsWorkshops are customized around the audience and may combine instruction, guided exercises, and review of participant materials.
Approximately 3 hours of live instruction plus planning and materials.
Approximately 6 hours of instruction, exercises, discussion, and materials.
Custom two- or three-day programs. In-person travel and accommodation are additional.
The illustrative sample uses a public scientific claim and shows the structure, level of directness, and distinction between evidence and overreach.
Include the principal claim, available materials, intended audience, and any deadline.
